True Intention defines the internal alignment required before any Truthfarian™ action can proceed. It regulates the underlying purpose of conduct so that every decision, communication, and corrective step remains proportional, ethical, and stabilising.
True Intention rejects reaction. It rejects conduct shaped by retaliation, fear, exhaustion, frustration, anger, institutional provocation, or pressure from collapsing systems. It establishes that intention must not be distorted by the environment, even when the environment is behaving unlawfully, irrationally, or destructively.
True Intention requires that motivation remains anchored in the restoration of equilibrium. In this framework, equilibrium is not theoretical; it refers to the actual stabilisation of events, records, narrative, and conduct across all affected domains. The motive behind action must be to correct imbalance, not to impose further imbalance.
True Intention includes:
- maintaining ethical neutrality even under pressure,
- refusing to escalate harm in response to harm,
- resisting institutional behaviours designed to provoke collapse,
- keeping purpose aligned to proportional correction,
- preventing intention from being shaped by emotional drift,
- ensuring that every action aligns with the obligation to restore balance,
- and maintaining discipline when systems attempt to destabilise or distort.
True Intention does not permit ambiguity. Purpose must be clean, direct, factual, and based on restoring coherent truth. This alignment ensures that actions do not multiply harm, do not introduce secondary injury, and do not create new distortions.
Where institutions act in bad faith, True Intention prevents conduct from becoming reactive. Where systems seek to destabilise through delay or obstruction, True Intention preserves the centre of purpose. Where harm accumulates, True Intention ensures that action remains guided by proportional equilibrium rather than emotional amplification.
True Intention is the stabilising force that guarantees every action originates from balance, not from reaction or drift. It is the point where motive is brought into alignment with truth, proportionality, and the restoration of equilibrium.
Legal Alignment
I. Magna Carta (1215)
“No free man shall be seized or imprisoned… except by the lawful judgment of his equals or by the law of the land.”
“To no one will we sell, to no one deny or delay right or justice.”
II. Church of England — Canon Law
“Every person shall be diligent in maintaining honesty and the integrity of their conduct.”
“The doctrine of the Church is grounded in truth and must be faithfully declared.”
III. Hebrew Law (Torah / Rabbinic / Halakha)
“Justice, justice shall you pursue.” (Deut. 16:20)
“Do not spread a false report.” (Ex. 23:1)
“You shall do no injustice in judgment.” (Lev. 19:15)
IV. Islamic Law (Qur’an / Hadith / Maqasid)
“Stand firmly for justice, even against yourselves.” (Qur’an 4:135)
“Do not mix the truth with falsehood or conceal the truth knowingly.” (Qur’an 2:42)
“False witness is among the gravest wrongs.” (Hadith)
V. Israeli Law — Basic Law: Human Dignity and Liberty
“Every person is entitled to protection of their life, body, and dignity.”
“A witness must testify truthfully; false testimony is a criminal offence.”
VI. Common Law Maxims
“Truth fears nothing.” (Veritas Nihil Veretur)
“False in one thing, false in everything.” (Falsus in Uno, Falsus in Omnibus)
VII. Duty of Candour (UK)
“Public bodies must act with full candour, accuracy, and transparency when presenting facts.”
“Omission, delay, or distortion constitutes procedural breach.”
VIII. Article 6 — Right to a Fair Hearing (ECHR)
“A person is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal.”
“Fairness collapses where records are unclear or evidence is concealed.”
IX. Article 13 — Right to an Effective Remedy (ECHR)
“Everyone whose rights are violated shall have an effective remedy before a national authority.”
“A remedy must be real, practical, and capable of restoring balance.”
X. Principle of Proportionality (UK & EU)
“Institutional action must not exceed what is necessary or appropriate to achieve its lawful aim.”
“Overreaction and underreaction both constitute legal imbalance.”
XI. Hammerton v United Kingdom (2016)
“Institutional error, delay, or mismanagement that causes real harm breaches the State’s duty to maintain justice.”
“The burden created by unlawful delay cannot be transferred onto the individual.”
XII. R (Cartwright) v DPP (2007)
“Misstatement, omission, or distortion of material fact by an authority is unlawful.”
“The factual record must remain accurate and unaltered.”
XIII. Natural Justice — Audi Alteram Partem
“No person shall be condemned unheard.”
“Every party must have clear opportunity to present their case, free from distortion or concealment.”