A costs-based threat issued during active Employment Tribunal proceedings was followed by the issue of a civil claim supported by extensive medical vulnerability evidence. Although the Defendant filed an Acknowledgment of Service indicating an intention to defend, no Defence was ever served.
This disclosure documents a tribunal process in which formal knowledge of medical vulnerability was established during live proceedings. That knowledge activated a duty to apply procedural adjustment or accommodation, shifting the system into a safeguarded state under Truth-Variant principles.
Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 (PIDA) — publication of structural risk, governance imbalance, and systemic capture indicators, without attribution or allegation.
A corroded radiator bleed/isolation valve failed catastrophically during a routine attempt to restore heating within a private rented dwelling already subject to live disrepair proceedings.
On 30 June 2025, the claimant submitted the complete Exceptional Hardship Fund form, supporting documents, and full budget breakdown through West Berkshire Council’s secure portal.
This disclosure documents a 51-day administrative delay by the County Court Business Centre (CNBC) in responding to correspondence sent on 6 October 2025, with a reply issued only on 27 November 2025, well outside HMCTS’s own 10–20 day standard and 28-day maximum.
On 14 November 2025, DAC Beachcroft LLP served a Skeleton Argument directly on the Claimant while Reading County Court was non-responsive: no acknowledgement of the Claimant’s N244, no confirmed listing, and no sealed order.
This disclosure examines a letter issued through the Judicial Support Section that attributed procedural statements to a judicial officer which do not align with the Civil Procedure Rules, the Practice Directions, or the mandatory transfer criteria for high-value claims.
This disclosure examines an email sent on 12 November 2025 by DAC Beachcroft LLP to Reading County Court and simultaneously to the Claimant’s private email address, despite no designation of email as an address for service
This disclosure documents a sustained and systemic breakdown in the administration of Universal Credit by the Department for Work and Pensions, in which statutory safeguards for medically vulnerable claimants and litigation exemptions were repeatedly ignored while enforcement actions continued.
What began as a dispute over an implausible EPC “C” rating for an unretrofitted 1980s property in Reading became proof of a self-reinforcing civic loop. Each institution landlord, council, tax authority, and court validated the same false data, turning one fabricated document into systemic truth.
Upon arrival at Theale Surgery, the patient raised a direct conflict of interest: Dr Rock, the head of the practice and a named party in related civil proceedings, was scheduled to see him. The request to reschedule with another clinician was refused.
This is a working progress; I have many, as you can imagine, plenty of balls to juggle.
The navigation serves as a layout tool as I build this on the fly, so parts are inoperable at the moment. There is no data tracking it collects zero data at present, but i'll have to add a cookie to track articles soon, so GDPR. Update: I've added google cookies just to give me an idea of audience and pages visited, thanks. There’s so much to add here, but at least this is a start. Scroll to the bottom of the page or use the menus to view the "Disclosure" Articles under Truthfarian Principles and Public Interests for civic equality.
update:: 8th Dec 2025 Got the site running and all my maths is online free to use if it helps anyone, the same maths I am using in live cases, so cannot disclose all the formulas as yet, but theres a predictive modeller there which measures harm through maths, a first according to many of the AI's, not had any human feedback which hopefully that will change, maybe someone runs the code? Its so quiet..
A old friend of mine asked me about the images the animations, she loved them she thought I'd borrowed them, I said no I used an AI called mid-journey so can't take all the credit :) Really happy that the Google's AI is treating truthfarian like an institute a doctrine of law and maths. If you ask it "what is truthfarian law and maths" google's AI is writing it up...
I'm not sure how to describe the the world i'm in when i work with maths, the depths my mind has to got to to keep them visualised in my mind as well as port and test that logic online, its a pure, innocent world, a natural world, i can see the patterns and somehow visualise all of it in my head, it absorbs me, in some instance i think so deeply with zero's and matrices of those that it makes me dizzy and stop, every muscle in my brain exhausted like a marathon runner, reaching my minds cognitive boundaries. Although unsettling as it is, it is a paradise of mathematical harmony and total bliss.
Now back to the ugly world of humans cognitive biases, I have many disclosures to come, a new massive escalation this morning by post, more evidence, more breaches larger field.
Here to share this as I survive having been under duress for more than a year unable to find time to get a job or normal life simply due to this “War of Attrition.”
But their strategy hasn’t worked so far… I’m still here, despite nearly leaving this world twice, three or ...
When I collected my medical report for was 120 pages long, i think 5 years from when i first was diagnosed with Diabetes (I was just fat, coming back from healthy Vietnam to Trini food and England), but NHS classed me as definitely simply due to be "Caribbean" like they even know what that means (mixed race for me is like 4 distinct races, Scandinavian, Polynesian, North North Indian and West African (Yarubas))... Even I was shocked at how truly ill I really was, like many men we just keep going, because we don't complain we just do.
Courts give you timed response windows i've had 7 days - 28 days, there responses months?? This alone has exhausted me, working through nights, where days and nights are not inseparable anymore, just fixed date court dates and there rules, which they don't even follow? I often ask Alexa what day is it, I work, I fix food for 2 (my huskita will only eat cooked food (she is a first breed so ancestrally charged, but closer to human, than pet)), sleep maybe max 4 hrs, walk her about 4miles a day, well she walks me, then work. I don't have time to feel although my body does react to it, court letters always come on a Friday or Saturday, so yeah my heart is overworked with having to tackle courts suppressive tactics...And it continues. Akira got her assistance badge now, so I don't go to shops feeling lost and nervous.
NHS Negligence & Medical Events
First, after NHS negligence and a misdiagnosed breast abscess (mastitis) that progressed into recurrent infection and sepsis, caused by Metformin, a diabetic drug. I was sent home from A&E, collapsed hours later at my mother’s, and was taken by ambulance to resuscitation, treated for systemic infection, cooled to reduce hyperthermia, and stabilised with IV antibiotics.
Then recently, last October, a burnout/stroke event really scary; your legs feel like dead weights and you can’t walk. I also suffered nerve damage in my left hand, unable to grip for 3–4 months hence the broken door latch (landlord disrepair case) would have been helpful, but…
Seeking Justice — The Response I Got
“You don’t have a case you’re alive, aren’t you?”
Law of the Land — Ignored
I stand right by the law of the land, but they seem to ignore it: lawyers, solicitors, barristers, deputy judges (part-time judges), other judge types... this united brotherhood.
Landlord Case — Risk to Life
Even my landlord proclaimed to be a retired corporate lawyer. I’ve nearly paid £60,000 over the years for a house that’s a “Risk to Life”: live-wired lights with no switch, one fuse covering two floors, blocked fire exit, 20 cm floor gaps due to no insulation (loft water-tank broke probably claimed insurance and never fixed the damage), mould... OMG!!.
My son 20 at the time had come to live with me, he was suppose to come earlier but COVID had him stuck at his mums, destroying 2 academic years, he was planned to come reset instead he had to endure disrepair, a broken shower, ( he started working straight away nights in Tesco's ) for over a year it strained our relationship where he left about a year ago, and have not seen him since.
My mum hasn't been able to come visit and stay, the house is just to dangerous, she's 91 now, we are very close, and well, yeah this system is preventing time with my mum in her later years, may aim for several years after returning to England from working in Singapore and Vietnam.
When she refused, the landlord to fix a broken door latch (a fire exit) for £25, I asked her to write an email to explain why she won't fix it, she quoted a the explanation of what a door latch was from Collins dictionary, incriminating herself to legal disrepair and blocked fire exit, I filed. She retaliated with a possession claim. Now there’s collusion and compensation valued in the millions. It’s the small things that develop…
Locked Out of Care — Why Truthfarian Exists
I hope for resolution soon. I do not even have medical care from this borough. West Berkshire Council and Reading County Court are involved in fraud and Grenfell-mirror offences while I fight for my rights.
They’re basically locking me out. They know I have no money. All I write here is my testimony. I bought the domain Truthfarian (a new word) and gave it depth doctrine and insight into how law actually works when stripped of performance tackling multiple entire legal systems solo.
Pattern of Intimidation
Instead, intimidation, delay, harassment, civil procedure rules broken. All lawyers, barristers, judges have felt it actually necessary to not communicate with facts but to perform some sort of harassment ritual meant to intimidate. I'm from working class hard knocks; at 55 years old it takes much for that to work. I fight, I have been brought up that way. As a young boy with skinheads around, my dad would say, “why are you getting beat up,” and taught me early how to handle myself. He was an electrician foreman, quite an achievement for a short Trinidadian man in the 70’s on building sites, big jobs he ran like City Bank; he was very tough.
I have also felt the harsh whip of law from being a black youth (mixed race, anything brown is…) in W. London, targeted, humiliated, made an example of. Even in my 40's waiting for a tube at 8pm, after a 12-hour day at an office in Liverpool Street leading a team, I was approached and searched because I “fit the description” of a black man who stole an iPhone.
Early Life, Bias & Resilience
As a child, with care of teachers, house captain, maybe the first non-white Joseph in a Middle School nativity play then abandoned through institutional bias since high school in Ealing. Exploited at design university (stolen designs), first to be exploited first to be made redundant,
Now I have nothing to lose but my dignity which no-one can take on lies alone. If I’d broken rules, fair enough. I haven’t. That “why” led me to law, maths, correlations, theses, and invention. This site shows what I’ve covered in just over a year, and I have no idea how I have done this all, but it seems the proper, logical and correct way. And very exhausted am I, and not sure how I keep going either...I have my mum, and Akira my Husky Akita mix, she's an anchor, but has to endure watching her daddy in distress...
DWP and Universal Credit
DWP and Universal Credit wow the racial profiling I've faced is surreal.
I never thought it would actually be worse as I got older. I was a single dad over a decade ago and lucky to get benefits, now when I was ill, and made redundant they refused to help.
Imagine: from just a few years ago, I went from earning £330 a day, nearly £90,000 a year, to £56,000 a year, and now to this, £800 a month — and I can’t even get a job because of all these cases being suppressed.
I took advantage of the exemption from court fees; my cases court cost must be close to £20,000 with all the uplifts of escalated offences, months of suppression the only benefit... being on benefits.
They too last month illegally reduced it £300 ignoring my exempt for work due to DWP rules of claimant in litigation. They maybe have been the worse, getting work calls after I’ve spent all night, hoarse, barely able to talk and in clear distress, being told you have to take these calls.
I was nearly in tears in some instances just because of the injustice, and all I was told was, “you have to do this call every month,” one week before I got my benefit money.It’s madness, pure and simple. They know I’m exempt, they know the law, and they still carry on. How can a government department operate like that? It’s persecution dressed up as policy.
Why I’m Publishing
I hope this helps citizens going forward against a system built to prey on the weak and vulnerable. None of this was instigated by me. I’ve simply defended my right to be treated fairly as a human being which is a fundamental legal right globally, UN, Geneva, ICC that UK and the Commonwealth must abide by.
The right to fair and humane treatment is a recognised fundamental human right under international law specifically the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR, 1948), the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), and conventions under the UN and Geneva frameworks. The United Kingdom and all Commonwealth states are bound by those treaties and conventions. They have ratified them and incorporated them into domestic law through instruments like the Human Rights Act 1998, which enshrines those same protections within UK jurisdiction.
What Comes Next
With the cases absolute silence from the courts...Am still here in this decrepit building (another freezing winter to come), unemployed, with more threats of sanctions, I am hoping to get some funds to push through my models, my work...
Below is the methodology through to disclosures.
I will also be releasing white papers so some of that navigation gets filled up
Thank you for your time.
Mission and Ethos — Veritas Liberabit Vos
Truthfarian functions as the civic and lawful layer of a unified equilibrium system grounded in mathematical, moral, and ancestral coherence. It applies the Truthvenarian Principle truth measured, not declared. The framework operates through three living strata of coherence: Truthvariant (Language Field), Sansana (Moral Law), and Truthvenarianism (Ethical Doctrine).
Truthfarian, The Civic & Lawful Layer
Truthfarian is the civic and lawful expression of equilibrium truth measured, not declared. Language and law are one field, governed by mathematical coherence.
( Truth = Eq(𝓢) with 𝓢 = ⟨𝓧, 𝓡, 𝓛, 𝓔⟩ )
Virtus — moral alignment
Fides — relational trust
Tempus — temporal rhythm
Pressura — endurance under duress
( Cₜ ↑ & Ωₗ ↓ ⇒ Eq(𝓢) )
This is the public gate: words enter only if they satisfy the same equilibrium law as the math.
Truthvenarian Principle
Truth = Eq(𝓢), where 𝓢 = ⟨states, relations, language, ethics⟩.
Truth exists when the total system holds equilibrium across four axes of human integrity:
Virtus — moral alignment
Fides — relational trust
Tempus — temporal rhythm
Pressura — endurance under duress
When these remain in proportion, coherence (C↑) rises and ownership-load (Ω↓) falls.
Operational Model of Truth
Truth = f(M, Tᵣ, τ, D)
When moral alignment, relational trust, temporal rhythm and endurance under duress remain balanced, coherence rises (C↑) and ownership-load falls (Ω↓).
“Et cognoscetis veritatem, et veritas liberabit vos.” — John 8 : 32 · “You shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free.”
The Gospel statement becomes a measurable law of equilibrium rather than a metaphor of faith.
Emancipation Formula
Ef = f(ΔC − ΔΩ) ≥ 0
Freedom is achieved when the rate of coherence gain exceeds the rate of systemic ownership or suppression. Each lawful disclosure within Truthfarian acts as a mathematical correction — a reduction of distortion until equilibrium is restored.
Truth = Freedom is an operational statement validated through proportional-harm analysis (Sansana).
Truthvenarian Equilibrium:
Truth = Eq(𝓢) where 𝓢 = ⟨𝓧, 𝓡, 𝓛, 𝓔⟩ — a state of coherent self-governance across cognitive, relational, linguistic, and ethical layers.
Stability holds when C ↑, Ω ↓, 𝔄 → 0, κ → 0.
Legal Citation – Magna Carta (1215):
“Nulli vendemus, nulli negabimus aut differemus rectum aut justiciam.” Translation:“To no one will we sell, to no one deny or delay right or justice.”
This clause remains the primary equilibrium between authority and conscience, defining the immovable boundary of moral governance. It is the earliest surviving legal articulation of the equilibrium principle that justice cannot be commodified, deferred, or withheld.
Legal Citation – Church of England (Ecclesia Anglicana):
“The Church of England shall be free, and shall have all her whole rights and liberties inviolable.” — Magna Carta, Clause 1 (1215)
This clause affirms the inseparability of truth and conscience within moral law the recognition that divine moral equilibrium cannot be overridden by civil authority. Within the Truthfarian framework, this forms the ethical constant linking spiritual conscience and civic duty under one lawful equation.
Legal Citation – Common Law Maxim:
“Ubi jus ibi remedium” Translation:“Where there is a right, there is a remedy.”
This maxim defines the restorative nature of law the proportional correction of harm and the restoration of coherence through remedy. Over fifty Commonwealth jurisdictions, representing nearly two billion people, continue to apply this foundation of English common law. Truthfarianism operates within this lineage: lawful disclosure as equilibrium, remedy as restoration of coherence.
Readers can study the structural law in the Doctrine section and its applied computation within the Method architecture.
Foundational Axioms
The Truthfarian system rests on four axioms
Moral → Coherence Axiom
Reciprocal → Reciprocity Axiom
Temporal → Non-Ownership Axiom
Embodied → Embodiment Axiom
defining the parameters through which coherence sustains truth.
Moral
Coherence Axiom (Cₐ)
Cₐ = ΔC / Δt > 0 ⇒ Truth
Truth exists where coherence increases over time. Sustained alignment of state and conscience generates authentic equilibrium.
Reciprocal
Reciprocity Axiom (Rₐ)
Rₐ = Σ ( λᵢ ↔ μᵢ )
Ethical reciprocity maintains energy balance between expression (λ) and reception (μ); imbalance creates distortion.
Temporal
Non-Ownership Axiom (Nₐ)
Ω ∝ 1 / R
Ownership inversely relates to reciprocity excess control breeds entropy. Systems remain truthful only when power and exchange are balanced.
Embodied
Embodiment Axiom (Eₐ)
Eₐ = ψ(body) = ψ(language) = ψ(consciousness)
Body, language, and consciousness are functionally inseparable. Reduction yields approximation, not truth.
Core Framework Hierarchy
Truthvenarianism
Ontological Law of Systemic Coherence
Defines truth as equilibrium across states, relations, language and ethics. Governing equation:
Eq(𝓢) = Σ ( Δc − ΔΩ ) ≥ 0
A system is truthful when total coherence surplus is non-negative.
Sansana
Ethical–Legal Calculus of Harm and Reciprocity
Derived from Φ = f(Δψ · Δρ), where ψ is subjective harm potential and ρ is reciprocal response.
Sansana quantifies equilibrium drift across moral and legal events.
Truthfarianism
Applied Discipline of Living Equilibrium
The civic practice of expressing truth through behaviour, speech and lawful transparency.
The living expression of equilibrium coherence made visible.
Equilibrium Chain
Truthvenarianism → Sansana → Truthfarianism
From ontological law to applied life: truth moves through equation, ethics and embodiment.
Active Public Disclosures, A Lawful Evidence of Systemic Breach
Lawful Evidence Bundles
Verified evidence bundles prepared under lawful disclosure. Each record functions as equilibrium restoration through proof.
Public Interest Disclosure Act
Protected disclosure under PIDA 1998 ensures safety, accountability, and public right to truth.
Systemic Failure
Systemic failure documented, not rhetoric, but verified breakdown across law, health, and housing.
The Active Public Disclosures section forms the civic record of the Truthfarian system. It exists to publish verified evidence of institutional or procedural failure where harm, negligence, or discrimination have occurred and where standard accountability routes have collapsed.
Each publication is a lawful act under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 (PIDA) and contributes to the equilibrium principle that defines Truthfarian ethics: truth as coherence restoration through evidence.
This record does not rely on belief, conjecture, or ideology. It documents the factual chain of events that led to measurable human, structural, or ethical imbalance. Each entry is therefore a mathematical and moral correction, proof that exposure itself is an act of equilibrium, restoring public right over private concealment.
Moral Law
Derived from the Truthvenarian Principle: coherence and justice are inseparable. Moral equilibrium defines the integrity of disclosure itself.
Civil Law
Rooted in Magna Carta (1215) and the common law maxim Ubi jus ibi remedium,where there is a right, there is a remedy.
Statutory Law
Protected under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 (PIDA). Ensures that publication of evidence is not rebellion but lawful restoration of balance between state, citizen, and system.
All disclosures published herein are filed, verified, and authored by Endarr Carlton Ramdin, self-litigant and lawful whistleblower acting under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 and the Truthfarian Equilibrium Protocol.
Mr Ramdin serves as the lawful party in multiple ongoing proceedings, including employment, civil, and human-rights litigation currently under the jurisdiction of UK courts.
Publication of these materials constitutes lawful evidence preservation, not public commentary or opinion.
Watchdog Report: Justice Denied in Reading
County Courts under fire – Parliament Committee brands the system “dysfunctional and failing to deliver justice”.
Behind closed doors at Reading County Court, the same failures identified by the House of Commons Justice Committee have come sharply into focus. Case files missing, directions ignored, and vulnerable claimants left unheard, the warning signs of systemic breakdown are no longer theoretical.
The Committee’s report, “Justice Denied: ‘Dysfunctional’ County Court System Failing to Deliver Justice”, described a network in urgent need of reform. In Reading, the evidence tells the same story: a judiciary stretched beyond capacity, administration outsourced to error, and procedural fairness eroded by delay.
This Truthfarian Watchdog Report collates verified case materials showing how local governance, welfare enforcement and legal representation intertwined to suppress remedy and distort process. The disclosures that follow are not commentary, they are documentary proof of equilibrium collapse within one of Britain’s most ordinary towns.
When costs pressure replaces adjudication and procedure is used to foreclose defence.
A costs-based threat issued during active Employment Tribunal proceedings was followed by the issue of a civil claim supported by extensive medical vulnerability evidence. Although the Defendant filed an Acknowledgment of Service indicating an intention to defend, no Defence was ever served.Instead, the Defendant pursued early termination of the cl…
Sources:
DAC Beachcroft LLP — Conflicts of Interest and Institutional Control
DAC Beachcroft LLP — Procedural Interference Through Unauthorised Communication
DAC Beachcroft LLP — Procedural Interference and Intimidation During Judicial Freeze
Reading County Court — Suppression and Procedural Breach
CNBC Failure to Respond Within a Reasonable Time
Tribunal Knowledge of Medical Vulnerability and Subsequent Procedural Detriment
Medical Denial — When Legal Defence Overrides Care
Legal Breaches Identified
Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, r.2 (Overriding Objective)
Recorded medical vulnerability followed by unadjusted process, exposing institutional inertia across law and care systems
This disclosure documents a tribunal process in which formal knowledge of medical vulnerability was established during live proceedings. That knowledge activated a duty to apply procedural adjustment or accommodation, shifting the system into a safeguarded state under Truth-Variant principles. Despite this, proceedings continued without adjust…
Sources:
Tribunal procedural records and case-management architecture
Published statutory frameworks (UK legislation and procedural rules)
Human rights instruments (ECHR, ICCPR) and associated jurisprudence
Equality and safeguarding duties applicable to public authorities
Regulated legal-services standards and professional conduct frameworks
NHS medication-monitoring standards and safeguarding expectations
Subject Access Request medical chronology (lawfully obtained)
Truthfarian proportional-harm and institutional-inertia analysis
Legal Breaches Identified
Human Rights Act 1998 — Article 6 Right to a fair hearing in the determination of civil rights and obligations, compromised by unadjusted procedure despite known vulnerability.
Human Rights Act 1998 — Article 8 Interference with physical and psychological integrity through continued procedural pressure after vulnerability was formally recorded.
European Convention on Human Rights — Articles 6 and 8 Failure to ensure fair process and respect for personal integrity once medical vulnerability was known.
ICCPR — Articles 2(3) and 14(1) Denial of effective remedy and equality before tribunals in circumstances of known vulnerability.
Equality Act 2010 — Sections 20–21 Failure to make reasonable adjustments following formal notice of disability or impairment.
Equality Act 2010 — Section 149 (Public Sector Equality Duty) Failure by public authorities to have due regard to the need to remove or minimise disadvantage connected to disability.
Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 — Rule 2 Breach of the overriding objective to deal with cases fairly, justly, and on an equal footing.
Data Protection Act 2018 / UK GDPR (Special Category Data) Procedural handling of medical vulnerability information engaging heightened duties of care and lawful processing.
Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 Procedural detriment arising in the context of protected disclosures, including sustained pressure during a period of known vulnerability.
Common Law — Natural Justice and Procedural Fairness Failure to prevent foreseeable harm once vulnerability was known, rendering inaction unreasonable.
Archival imagery representing institutional memory, procedural record-keeping, and evidential control within adversarial legal systems.
Structural convergence of advisory, defence, and adjudicative functions within UK tribunal systems.
Disclosure BasisPublic Interest Disclosure Act 1998 (PIDA)— publication of structural risk, governance imbalance, and systemic capture indicators, without attribution or allegation.This disclosure examines the structural convergence between advisory, defence, and adjudicative functions within UK tribunal and civil-justice systems, with DAC Beachcro…
Sources:
Public statutory frameworks (UK legislation and procedural rules)
Published regulatory instruments and codes of conduct
Open public procurement and panel-appointment records
General tribunal and court procedural architecture
Truthfarian proportional-harm and equilibrium analysis
This disclosure does not rely on, disclose, or reproduce confidential information, party communications, or privileged material from any named organisation or proceeding.
Legal Breaches Identified
Human Rights Act 1998 — Article 6 (fair trial), Article 13 (effective remedy)
European Convention on Human Rights — Articles 6, 8, 13
Severely corroded radiator bleed/isolation valve following catastrophic mechanical failure. The valve could not be safely operated or shut off and discharged uncontrolled water into the surrounding workspace, initiating flooding adjacent to live electrical fittings and necessitating emergency improvised containment.
A routine attempt to restore heating in a property already subject to live disrepair proceedings escalated into a life-risk electrical and flooding incident, following prolonged landlord neglect, council non-action, and court suppression of safety evidenc
A corroded radiator bleed/isolation valve failed catastrophically during a routine attempt to restore heating within a private rented dwelling already subject to live disrepair proceedings. The failure released uncontrolled water into a confined workspace containing live electrical fittings, legal documents, and computer equipment. The incident occ…
Sources:
• Exhibit — Radiator bleed/isolation valve showing corrosion and seizure
• Exhibit — Water discharge and emergency bucket containment beside live socket
• Exhibit — Wall-mounted light fitting with exposed live wiring above impact zone
• Exhibit — Consumer unit showing single B32 breaker for all sockets
• Exhibit — Photographs of water-damaged papers, electronics, and workspace recovery
Legal Breaches Identified
• Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, s.11 — Failure to maintain heating, water, and electrical installations
• Defective Premises Act 1972, s.4 — Foreseeable risk of injury and property damage from known defects
• Homes (Fitness for Human Habitation) Act 2018 — Occupation of an unfit dwelling
• Electrical Safety Standards Regulations 2020 — Unsafe electrical installation and lack of safe isolation
Screenshot of the claimant’s secure West Berkshire Council email submission (30 June 2025), showing the Exceptional Hardship Fund form and supporting documents sent to the Benefits Team.
Despite full compliance, documented vulnerability, and a live hardship application, West Berkshire Council reframed lawful disclosure as non-cooperation and escalated council tax enforcement toward criminalisation.
On 30 June 2025, the claimant submitted the complete Exceptional Hardship Fund form, supporting documents, and full budget breakdown through West Berkshire Council’s secure portal. Despite the timestamped submission, the authority generated internal warnings alleging “failure to supply information”, a representation contradicted by the digital reco…
Sources:
• Secure submission screenshot (30 June 2025) • Exhibit WA3 — Visual Timeline of Messages and Issues • Email thread with West Berkshire Council (Benefits Team and Customer Services) • Gas certificate (2020) • “Dear British Gas” letter (Ref R0326179) • Exceptional Hardship Fund form and budget statement
Legal Breaches Identified
• Local Government Finance Act 1992 (s.13A(1)(c)) — failure to consider hardship before enforcement • Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992 (rr.34–36) — unlawful liability progression • Fraud Act 2006 (s.2) — false representation of non-submission • Equality Act 2010 (ss.20–21, s.149) — failure to apply vulnerability protections • Human Rights Act 1998
CNBC’s reply was issued on 27 November 2025, arriving 51 days after initial correspondence during active landlord proceedings.
A reply from the County Court Business Centre on 27 November 2025 was issued 51 days after the claimant's correspondence of 6 October 2025, delaying corrective action in landlord cases M04ZA309 and M00RG751.
This disclosure documents a 51-day administrative delay by the County Court Business Centre (CNBC) in responding to correspondence sent on 6 October 2025, with a reply issued only on 27 November 2025, well outside HMCTS’s own 10–20 day standard and 28-day maximum. The delay obstructed timely corrective action following a 1 September 2025 possession…
Sources:
Exhibit — CNBC Email (27 November 2025)
Exhibit — Correspondence to CNBC (6 October 2025)
Exhibit — Possession Order (1 September 2025)
Legal Breaches Identified
Human Rights Act 1998 (Article 6) — Delay obstructed a fair hearing within a reasonable time.
HMCTS Standards — 51-day delay exceeded the 10–20 day benchmark and the 28-day extended limit.
Equality Act 2010 (Sections 20–21) — No reasonable adjustments for a vulnerable litigant.
Equality Act 2010 (Section 149) — Failure to minimise disadvantage affecting a protected party.
Civil Procedure Rules (CPR 1.1) — Departure from the overriding objective of expeditious and fair handling.
Common Law Fairness — Public authority delay adversely affecting procedural rights.
Skeleton arguments, case-dumps, and court silence — how DAC Beachcroft escalated intimidation during a live judicial freeze in claim M05ZA443
On 14 November 2025, DAC Beachcroft LLP served a Skeleton Argument directly on the Claimant while Reading County Court was non-responsive: no acknowledgement of the Claimant’s N244, no confirmed listing, and no sealed order. This followed the unsealed 12 September 2025 letter attributed to DDJ Hocking, issued only by post, not logged on CE-File, an…
Sources:
Improper Skeleton Service — Breach of CPR 23.7 and 39.5 by serving a skeleton argument without directions, listing, or sealed order.
Abuse of Process — Conduct amounting to abuse under CPR 3.4(2)(b) by weaponising procedure against a vulnerable litigant.
Jurisdictional Misrepresentation — Ultra vires statements regarding transfer contrary to Practice Direction 7A paragraphs 2.4–2.6.
Record-Keeping Failures — Breach of HMCTS digital protocols, Public Records Act 1958 and Data Protection Act 2018 through off-record judicial correspondence.
Fraud Act 2006 (s.2) — False representation of procedural authority through timing, format, and deployment of documents.
Administration of Justice Act 1970 (s.40) — Harassment and intimidation by documentary overburdening and court-like communications.
Human Rights Act 1998 — Violations of Articles 6, 8 and 13 through lack of fair hearing, transparency, and remedy.
PIDA 1998 — Retaliatory conduct against protected disclosure within ongoing whistleblower litigation.
SRA Principles — Failure to uphold the rule of law, to act with integrity, and to maintain independence from state-linked institutional capture.
Legal Breaches Identified
I. Civil Procedure Rules — Parts 1, 3, 23, 32 and 39; Practice Direction 7A; Practice Directions 52A and 52C.
II. HMCTS Digital Communications Protocol (2024) and Record Management Policy.
III. Fraud Act 2006 — Section 2 (False Representation).
IV. Administration of Justice Act 1970 — Section 40 (Harassment of Debtors – intimidation principles).
V. Human Rights Act 1998 — Articles 6, 8 and 13 (ECHR incorporated rights).
VI. Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 (PIDA) — Protected disclosures and retaliation.
VII. SRA Principles (2024) — Principles 1–3 and 5 (Rule of law, integrity, independence, standard of service).
VIII. Truthfarian Evidence — Email threads, envelope evidence, and skeleton-argument service logs in M05ZA443.
Judicial correspondence diverging from the Civil Procedure Rules before adjudication has begun.
When official communication contradicts the Civil Procedure Rules, the procedural record collapses before the case reaches a judge.
This disclosure examines a letter issued through the Judicial Support Section that attributed procedural statements to a judicial officer which do not align with the Civil Procedure Rules, the Practice Directions, or the mandatory transfer criteria for high-value claims.The Truthfarian framework defines this event as procedural misstatement a devia…
Sources:
HMCTS Digital Communications Protocol (2024)
Civil Procedure Rules (Ministry of Justice)
Practice Direction 7A — High-Value Claims
Judicial Conduct Investigations Office — Standards of Judicial Behaviour
Truthfarian Evidence — HMCTS Letter (12 September)
Legal Breaches Identified
I. Civil Procedure Rules, Part 23, Rule 23.6 — Statement of “applications before the court” inconsistent with filed record.
II. Civil Procedure Rules, Part 15, Rule 15.2 — No Defence filed; disposal cannot be advanced by the Defendant.
III. Practice Direction 7A, Paragraphs 2.4–2.6 — Mandatory High Court transfer criteria breached in a claim exceeding £10 million and involving public-authority issues.
IV. Civil Procedure Rules, Part 30, Rule 30.3(2)(f) — Failure to transfer where complexity and value require High Court allocation.
V. Human Rights Act 1998 / European Convention on Human Rights, Article 6 — Procedural fairness compromised by judicial mis-narration.
VI. Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Articles 7, 8 & 10 — Departure from equal protection, remedy, and fair-hearing standards.
VII. Magna Carta (1215), Clauses 39–40 — Delay and distortion of justice arising from procedural misstatement.
Service by unapproved channel during active proceedings a departure from rule-based process.
Direct solicitor–litigant contact using an unassigned service address during active proceedings, contrary to Civil Procedure Rules and professional-conduct standards.
This disclosure examines an email sent on 12 November 2025 by DAC Beachcroft LLP to Reading County Court and simultaneously to the Claimant’s private email address, despite no designation of email as an address for service and no procedural basis for direct contact during live proceedings. The communication sought to influence the handling of an up…
Sources:
Civil Procedure Rules — Part 6 (Service of Documents)
Solicitors Regulation Authority — Code of Conduct for Solicitors
Equality & Human Rights Commission — Fair Hearing Standards
Civil Procedure Rules, Part 6, Rule 6.3 — Service must use permitted methods; email requires explicit written agreement.
Civil Procedure Rules, Part 6, Rule 6.23 — No designation of the Claimant’s private email as an address for service.
Civil Procedure Rules, Part 15, Rule 15.2 — No Defence filed; the Defendant lacks standing to advance disposal or influence listing.
Solicitors Regulation Authority Principles (2024) — Departures from independence, integrity, and proper administration of justice.
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 14 — Fair process affected by irregular solicitor communication.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Articles 7 & 10 — Equality before the law and fair-hearing standards impacted.
Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (1963) — Right of a Trinidad & Tobago national to notify consular authorities where procedural irregularities occur abroad.
This disclosure documents a sustained and systemic breakdown in the administration of Universal Credit by the Department for Work and Pensions, in which statutory safeguards for medically vulnerable claimants and litigation exemptions were repeatedly ignored while enforcement actions continued. Between October 2024 and October 2025, declared vulner…
From landlord misrepresentation to judicial neglect — a closed civic circuit of fraud and verification failure.
How a single false EPC certificate exposed a feedback loop of corruption between landlord, council, revenue, and court.
What began as a dispute over an implausible EPC “C” rating for an unretrofitted 1980s property in Reading became proof of a self-reinforcing civic loop. Each institution landlord, council, tax authority, and court validated the same false data, turning one fabricated document into systemic truth.The Ramdin v Gopal case reveals that EPC fraud functi…
Fraud Act 2006 (s.2) — False representation through knowingly inaccurate EPC data and subsequent judicial reliance.
Energy Performance of Buildings (England & Wales) Regulations 2012 (rr.6–11) — Failure to verify or inspect before certification.
Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 — Misleading commercial practice causing consumer detriment.
Local Government Finance Act 1992 & Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992 — Retaliatory enforcement using falsified property data.
Equality Act 2010 (ss.20–21, s.149 PSED) — Failure to accommodate vulnerability during enforcement and proceedings.
Human Rights Act 1998 (Art.6 & Art.8) — Denial of fair hearing and violation of dignity through systemic neglect.
Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 (s.43A et seq.) — Protection engaged for disclosure of institutional collusion and falsified data.
Theale Surgery, where clinical duty met the shadow of its own defence firm, DAC Beachcroft LLP.
Head GP Dr Rock and her practice are now defended by DAC Beachcroft LLP, the same institutional law-firm nexus involved in multiple systemic cases. What began as a medical visit became evidence of legal governance replacing healthcare
Upon arrival at Theale Surgery, the patient raised a direct conflict of interest: Dr Rock, the head of the practice and a named party in related civil proceedings, was scheduled to see him. The request to reschedule with another clinician was refused. The appointment proceeded under protest an encounter already compromised by the surgery’s defence …
Embedded across NHS, insurers, and public-sector contracts, DAC Beachcroft’s dual role blurs state and commerce, turning governance itself into a client.
A 250-Year Pattern of Corporate Governance Masquerading as Justice
Evidence shows DAC Beachcroft LLP operating simultaneously as defence counsel for private insurers and as legal advisers to public authorities. This structural duality constitutes a persistent conflict of interest under the Legal Services Act 2007 and SRA Principles (2024), undermining impartial administration of justice and corrupting equality bef…
Reading County Court, A nexus of procedural breakdown, lost filings, and judicial inconsistency across multiple Deputy District Judges.
Suppressed filings, conflicting orders, and unlawful listings, a study in civic malfunction and systemic discrimination.
Case bundles transferred from the County Court Business Centre (CNBC) with all fees paid were later suppressed under administrative pretexts. Over 2,800 pages of evidence, including the full N244 Application, vulnerability statements, and medical certificates, disappeared from the live judicial file while contradictory directions were issued by mul…
If you have time please leave a review its much appreciated, thank you
Your feedback is evidence. Submissions are anonymised, time-stamped, and incorporated into the Proportional Harm Model to inform the live equilibrium assessment.
This content is rated with an average of
0.0
0 reviews
Share Your Evaluation of This Content
Your rating will help me assess the clarity, structure, or impact of this material.
